Weigh-in-Motion

 

Strengths of WIM

1. Processing Rate.  Trucks can be weighed as they as they travel at highway speeds, resulting in a significantly greater number of counted vehicles in a short period of time compared to static weight stations.
2. Safety.  The minimization of static weighing will significantly decrease vehicle accumulation at highway lanes leading to weight stations.
3. Continuous data processing.  WIM can be performed continuously rather than static weighing, which uses traffic streams samples.  This can eliminate any inherent data bias in static weighing.
4. Increased coverage and lower cost.  More sites may be monitored with WIM at the same cost.
5. Minimized scale avoidance.  WIM can monitor truck traffic without alerting truck drivers.  This results in more truthful data as overweight trucks are less likely to avoid weighing stations.

Shortcomings of WIM

1. Less accurate.  WIM systems are less accurate than static scales. According to the National Bureau of Standards, wheel load scales are required to have an accuracy of ±1% when tested for certification and must be maintained thereafter at ±2%.  The best accuracy obtained with the most expensive commonly used WIM devices is 6% of actual vehicle weights for 95% of measured trucks.
2. Reduced information.  Truck information that is easily collected at static weight stations such as fuel type, state of registry, year model, loaded or unloaded status, origin, and destination cannot be obtained with typical WIM systems.

Contemporary WIM Technology

The most widely accepted and utilized WIM devices:

• Piezoelectric Sensor. The most common WIM device. The sensor is embedded in the pavement and produces a charge that is equivalent to the deformation induced by the tire loads on the pavement’s surface. It is common to install two inductive loops and two piezoelectric sensors in each monitored lane. A properly installed and calibrated Piezoelectric WIM system can provide gross vehicle weights that are within 15% of the actual vehicle weight for 95% of the measured trucks.
• Piezoelectric Quartz Sensor. The most common technology used for collection of accurate WIM data. The sensor is embedded in a slot, 72 mm wide X 55 mm deep (2.83” x 2.16”) cut within the pavement, and the piezoelectric quartz disks generate an electrical charge proportional to the applied forces. The electric charge signals are converted by a charge amplifier into exactly proportional voltages which can be further processed as required. The accuracy of the measured wheel load is not influenced by tire type, tire quantity or tire pressure. The advanced and certified piezoelectric quartz WIM systems collect and process traffic data without impact to traffic flow and reach an accuracy of up to 2.5 % GVW and feature an extremely high lifetime.
• Bending Plate.  The bending scale consists of two steel platforms that are 0.6 x 2 m (2 ft. x 6 ft.), adjacently placed to cover a 3.65 m (12 ft.) lane.  The plates are instrumented with strain gages, which measures tire load induced plate strains. The measured strains are then analyzed to determine the tire load.  A properly installed and calibrated bending plate WIM system can provide gross vehicle weights that are within 10% of the actual vehicle weight for 95% of the measured trucks.

Enviko Technology Co.,Ltd

E-mail: info@enviko-tech.com

https://www.envikotech.com

Chengdu Office: No. 2004, Unit 1, Building 2, No. 158, Tianfu 4th Street, Hi-tech Zone, Chengdu

Hong Kong Office: 8F, Cheung Wang Building, 251 San Wui Street, Hong Kong

Factory: Building 36, Jinjialin Industrial Zone, Mianyang City, Sichuan Province