Comparison of Key Features of Weigh-In-Motion Sensors

The three mainstream types of Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) sensors:Quartz (Enviko and others), Plate Type,
and Strip Strain Gauge, each have their own characteristics. Below is a
comparative analysis of their features.
Quartz Piezoelectric sensors use the piezoelectric effect, offering
high-frequency response, a wide measurement range, compact size, easy
installation, and no power supply requirement. They work well for speeds from
1-200 km/h, have excellent long-term stability, low maintenance costs, and a
lifespan of 5-10 years.
Plate Type sensors use strain resistance technology and are suitable
for low-speed (0-40 km/h) or static weighing. Accuracy decreases above 30 km/h.
Installation requires a large foundation pit, leading to long construction
times, significant traffic disruption, high maintenance costs, and a short
lifespan of 1-3 years.
Strip Strain Gauge sensors are designed for medium to low-speed
weighing (1-60 km/h) but become less accurate above 40 km/h. Installation is
complex, maintenance costs are high, and the lifespan ranges from 3-5 years.
Overall, Quartz Piezoelectric sensors perform best in terms of
measurement range, long-term stability, easy installation, and low maintenance
costs, making them ideal for high-speed WIM. Plate Type and Strip Strain Gauge
sensors are more suitable for medium and low-speed applications.
Category |
Quartz |
Plate Type |
Strip Strain Gauge |
|
Enviko |
Others |
|||
Technical Principle |
Based on piezoelectric effect, charge output is
proportional to force, high-frequency response, wide measurement range, small
size, easy installation; no power supply required, excellent lightning
protection performance. |
Mechanical combined structure, resistance strain
principle, sensor deformation under force, causing resistance change,
suitable for low-speed or static weighing; requires power supply, poor
lightning protection performance. |
Resistance strain gauge sensor, mechanical
deformation when sensor is subjected to force, reflecting the magnitude of
force through deformation, suitable for quasi-static to low-frequency dynamic
weighing; requires power supply, poor lightning protection performance. |
|
Measurement Accuracy and Application |
Suitable for medium, low, and high speeds
(1-200km/h), fast response, almost unaffected by speed. Ideal for high-speed
weigh-in-motion (WIM), can also be used for traffic flow surveys and vehicle
type classification. |
Suitable for low speed (0-40km/h), accuracy decreases
when speed exceeds 30km/h. |
Suitable for medium and low speeds (1-60km/h),
unstable accuracy when speed exceeds 40km/h. |
|
Long-Term Stability |
Resistant to high and low temperatures and humidity
changes, suitable for complex environments. Stable, no frequent calibration
required. |
Susceptible to drift, requires regular calibration. |
Susceptible to drift, requires regular calibration. |
|
Installation Method |
Simple and fast installation, only need to cut a
small 50mm*70mm slot, minimal slotting, short construction period, minimal
impact on traffic. |
Requires digging a 1200mm*800mm foundation pit,
significant damage to the road, long construction period, significant impact
on traffic. Also need to consider drainage. |
Need to cut a
100mm*100mm slot, more complex construction. |
|
Maintenance Cost |
Low, stable, no frequent maintenance required for
long-term use. |
High (requires regular calibration, prone to
deformation and corrosion, high maintenance cost). |
High (requires regular calibration, prone to
deformation and corrosion, high maintenance cost). |
|
Service Life |
5 years. |
1-3 years (prone to deformation fatigue). |
3-5 years (prone to deformation fatigue). |
|
Driving Experience and Traffic Safety |
No impact. Good for safety |
Significant physical sensation; large surface area of
steel plate, prone to vehicle sideslip in rain and snow. |
No impact. Good for safety |
|
Cost |
Cheaper overall installation. |
Cheaper overall installation. |
Cheaper sensors themselves, more expensive overall
installation. |
Medium cost. |
Consistency Between Sensors |
Each sensor's sensitivity parameter (pC/N) is
controlled within the range of -1.8 to -2.1, demonstrating better consistency
in precision. |
Each sensor's sensitivity parameter (pC/N) is
controlled within the range of 1.7 (±12%), showing excessive fluctuation and poorer consistency in
precision. |
▁ |
▁ |
Sensor signal polarity |
Both positive and negative signals are supported.
Polarity can be customized based on customer requirements for greater
adaptability. |
Negative signal |
▁ |
▁ |
By Max Chung
Comments
Post a Comment