Comparison of Key Features of Weigh-In-Motion Sensors

The three mainstream types of Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) sensors:Quartz (Enviko and others), Plate Type,
and Strip Strain Gauge, each have their own characteristics. Below is a
comparative analysis of their features.
Quartz Piezoelectric sensors use the piezoelectric effect, offering
high-frequency response, a wide measurement range, compact size, easy
installation, and no power supply requirement. They work well for speeds from
1-200 km/h, have excellent long-term stability, low maintenance costs, and a
lifespan of 5-10 years.
Plate Type sensors use strain resistance technology and are suitable
for low-speed (0-40 km/h) or static weighing. Accuracy decreases above 30 km/h.
Installation requires a large foundation pit, leading to long construction
times, significant traffic disruption, high maintenance costs, and a short
lifespan of 1-3 years.
Strip Strain Gauge sensors are designed for medium to low-speed
weighing (1-60 km/h) but become less accurate above 40 km/h. Installation is
complex, maintenance costs are high, and the lifespan ranges from 3-5 years.
Overall, Quartz Piezoelectric sensors perform best in terms of
measurement range, long-term stability, easy installation, and low maintenance
costs, making them ideal for high-speed WIM. Plate Type and Strip Strain Gauge
sensors are more suitable for medium and low-speed applications.
| Category | Quartz | Plate Type | Strip Strain Gauge | |
| Enviko | Others | |||
| Technical Principle | Based on piezoelectric effect, charge output is
  proportional to force, high-frequency response, wide measurement range, small
  size, easy installation; no power supply required, excellent lightning
  protection performance. | Mechanical combined structure, resistance strain
  principle, sensor deformation under force, causing resistance change,
  suitable for low-speed or static weighing; requires power supply, poor
  lightning protection performance. | Resistance strain gauge sensor, mechanical
  deformation when sensor is subjected to force, reflecting the magnitude of
  force through deformation, suitable for quasi-static to low-frequency dynamic
  weighing; requires power supply, poor lightning protection performance. | |
| Measurement Accuracy and Application | Suitable for medium, low, and high speeds
  (1-200km/h), fast response, almost unaffected by speed. Ideal for high-speed
  weigh-in-motion (WIM), can also be used for traffic flow surveys and vehicle
  type classification. | Suitable for low speed (0-40km/h), accuracy decreases
  when speed exceeds 30km/h. | Suitable for medium and low speeds (1-60km/h),
  unstable accuracy when speed exceeds 40km/h. | |
| Long-Term Stability | Resistant to high and low temperatures and humidity
  changes, suitable for complex environments. Stable, no frequent calibration
  required. | Susceptible to drift, requires regular calibration. | Susceptible to drift, requires regular calibration. | |
| Installation Method | Simple and fast installation, only need to cut a
  small 50mm*70mm slot, minimal slotting, short construction period, minimal
  impact on traffic. | Requires digging a 1200mm*800mm foundation pit,
  significant damage to the road, long construction period, significant impact
  on traffic. Also need to consider drainage. | Need to cut a 
  100mm*100mm slot, more complex construction. | |
| Maintenance Cost | Low, stable, no frequent maintenance required for
  long-term use. | High (requires regular calibration, prone to
  deformation and corrosion, high maintenance cost). | High (requires regular calibration, prone to
  deformation and corrosion, high maintenance cost). | |
| Service Life | 5 years.  | 1-3 years (prone to deformation fatigue). | 3-5 years (prone to deformation fatigue). | |
| Driving Experience and Traffic Safety | No impact. Good for safety | Significant physical sensation; large surface area of
  steel plate, prone to vehicle sideslip in rain and snow. | No impact. Good for safety | |
| Cost | Cheaper overall installation. | Cheaper overall installation. | Cheaper sensors themselves, more expensive overall
  installation. | Medium cost. | 
| Consistency Between Sensors | Each sensor's sensitivity parameter (pC/N) is
  controlled within the range of -1.8 to -2.1, demonstrating better consistency
  in precision. | Each sensor's sensitivity parameter (pC/N) is
  controlled within the range of 1.7 (±12%), showing excessive fluctuation and poorer consistency in
  precision. | ▁ | ▁ | 
| Sensor signal polarity | Both positive and negative signals are supported.
  Polarity can be customized based on customer requirements for greater
  adaptability. | Negative signal | ▁ | ▁ | 
By Max Chung


 
 
Comments
Post a Comment